While an increasing number of publications in philosophy, psychology and neuroscience investigate “the self”, “self-consciousness” and “subjectivity”, these ambiguous concepts often remain loosely defined. A number of authors have suggested that there is such a thing as a basic sense of self or self-consciousness in the background of any phenomenally conscious experience (e.g. Chalmers, 1996, p. 10; Strawson, 1999, p. 102; Damasio, 1999, p. 19). This idea echoes William James’ intuition that “whatever I may be thinking of, I am always at the same time more or less aware of myself” (James, 1961, p. 42). Theoretical discussions of this claim have been hampered by introspective disagreement, and its proponents often appeal to the elusiveness of the basic sense of self to fend off sceptical concerns.
One promising approach to this debate is to investigate real-world cases of altered states of consciousness in which self-consciousness appears to be radically disrupted or altogether missing. On the one hand, the strong claim that a basic form of self-consciousness is necessary for phenomenal consciousness should be falsifiable, meaning that it could in principle be ruled out by empirical counter-examples. On the other hand, the weaker claim that a form of self-consciousness only pervades ordinary conscious states could be clarified by analyzing allegedly selfless states of consciousness. Even if these cases still involved a minimal kind of subjectivity, they might provide a phenomenal contrast to standard cases of self-consciousness that indirectly sheds light on whatever phenomenal property they are lacking. In other words, in order to find out whether there is a basic sense of self in ordinary experience and identify its characteristics and underlying mechanisms, it is helpful to investigate altered states of consciousness in which such sense of self is reported to be radically impaired or completely missing.
Over the past decade, philosophers and scientists have paid close attention to a number of empirical cases portrayed as disruptions of self-consciousness, including schizophrenic thought insertion (e.g. Billon, 2013; López-Silva, 2017; Parrott, 2017), alienation symptoms (e.g. Lane, 2014, 2015), depersonalisation disorder (e.g. Simeon & Abugel, 2006; Sass et al., 2013; Gerrans, 2015), somatoparaphrenia (e.g. Liang & Lane, 2009; de Vignemont, 2013; Gennaro, 2015), autoscopic phenomena (e.g. Blanke et al. 2004; Metzinger, 2013), full-body illusions (e.g. Blanke & Metzinger, 2009; Alsmith, 2010), and identity disorders (e.g. Metzinger, 2003b). However, most if not all of these empirical conditions cannot adequately be described as involving conscious states in which self-consciousness is radically disrupted, let alone altogether missing (Metzinger, 2003a, 2013; Limanowski, 2014). More specifically, such alterations are local, in the sense that they involve disruptions to a single non-necessary feature of self-consciousness such as the sense of agency (e.g., thought insertion) or body ownership (e.g., full-body illusions). By contrast, there is emerging empirical evidence suggesting that some non-ordinary states of consciousness may involve a more dramatic, global dissolution or total loss of self-consciousness. This might be the case during “non-dual awareness” meditation (Josipovic, 2010; Dor-Ziderman et. al., 2013; Berkovich-Ohana et al., 2013), drug-induced ego dissolution (Letheby & Gerrans, 2017; Millière, 2017), dreamless sleep mentation (Thompson, 2015; Windt et al., 2016), acute psychotic episodes (Saks, 2007), and partial epileptic seizures (Johanson et al., 2008).
By bringing key players in the field together, we hope to make progress on these matters and the set the stage for an empirically grounded and conceptually rigorous debate on self-consciousness and its limits. In particular, we invite original contributions investigating radical disruptions of self-consciousness, reflecting on what such alterations mean for our understanding of self-consciousness in ordinary states, and addressing the question of whether there can really be conscious states lacking any kind of self-consciousness whatsoever.
Alsmith, A. (2010). Minimal conditions for the simplest form of self-consciousness. Embodied Self, 35‑41.
Berkovich-Ohana, A., Dor-Ziderman, Y., Glicksohn, J., & Goldstein, A. (2013). Alterations in the sense of time, space, and body in the mindfulness-trained brain: a neurophenomenologically-guided MEG study. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00912
Billon, A. (2013). Does consciousness entail subjectivity? The puzzle of thought insertion. Philosophical Psychology, 26(2), 291‑314. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.625117
Blanke, O., Landis, T., Spinelli, L., & Seeck, M. (2004). Out‐of‐body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin. Brain, 127(2), 243‑258. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh040
Blanke, O., & Metzinger, T. (2009). Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(1), 7‑13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.003
Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press.
Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
de Vignemont, F. (2013). The mark of bodily ownership. Analysis, 73(4), 643‑651. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/ant080
Dor-Ziderman, Y., Berkovich-Ohana, A., Glicksohn, J., & Goldstein, A. (2013). Mindfulness-induced selflessness: a MEG neurophenomenological study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00582
Gennaro, R. J. (2015). 3 Somatoparaphrenia, Anosognosia, and Higher-Order Thoughts. Disturbed Consciousness: New Essays on Psychopathology and Theories of Consciousness, 55.
Gerrans, P. (2015). All the Self We Need. In T. Metzinger & J. Windt (eds.), Open MIND. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group. https://doi.org/10.15502/9783958570078
James, W. (1961). Psychology: The Briefer Course. (G. Allport, ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
Johanson, M., Valli, K., Revonsuo, A., & Wedlund, J.-E. (2008). Content analysis of subjective experiences in partial epileptic seizures. Epilepsy & Behavior, 12(1), 170‑182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.10.002
Josipovic, Z. (2010). Duality and nonduality in meditation research. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 1119‑1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.016
Lane, T. (2014). When Actions Feel Alien: An Explanatory Model. In T.-W. Hung (ed.), Communicative Action (p. 53–74). Springer Science+Business.
Lane, T. (2015). Self, Belonging, and Conscious Experience: A Critique of Subjectivity Theories of Consciousness. In R. J. Gennaro (Éd.), Disturbed consciousness: New essays on psychopathology and theories of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Letheby, C., & Gerrans, P. (2017). Self unbound: ego dissolution in psychedelic experience. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/nix016
Liang, C., & Lane, T. (2009). Higher-order thought and pathological self: the case of somatoparaphrenia. Analysis, anp094. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp094
Limanowski, J. (2014). What can body ownership illusions tell us about minimal phenomenal selfhood? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 946. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00946
López-Silva, P. (2017). Me and I Are Not Friends, Just Aquaintances: on Thought Insertion and Self-Awareness. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1‑17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0366-z
Metzinger, T. (2003a). Being No One: The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Metzinger, T. (2003b). Why Are Identity Disorders Interesting for Philosophers? In T. Schramme & J. Thome (Éd.), Philosophy and Psychiatry. De Gruyter.
Metzinger, T. (2013). Why are dreams interesting for philosophers? The example of minimal phenomenal selfhood, plus an agenda for future research. Consciousness Research, 4, 746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00746
Millière, R. (2017). Looking For The Self: Phenomenology, Neurophysiology and Philosophical Significance of Drug-induced Ego Dissolution. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00245
Parrott, M. (2017). Subjective Misidentification and Thought Insertion. Mind & Language, 32(1), 39‑64. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12132
Saks, E. R. (2007). The Center Cannot Hold: My Journey Through Madness (1 edition). New York: Hachette Books.
Sass, L., Pienkos, E., Nelson, B., & Medford, N. (2013). Anomalous self-experience in depersonalization and schizophrenia: A comparative investigation. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(2), 430‑441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.009
Simeon, D., & Abugel, J. (2006). Feeling Unreal: Depersonalization Disorder and the Loss of the Self. Oxford University Press.
Strawson, G. (1999). The Self and the SESMET. In Journal of Consciousness Studies (p. 99–135). Thorverton Uk: Imprint Academic.
Thompson, E. (2015). Dreamless Sleep, the Embodied Mind, and Consciousness. In T. Metzinger & J. Windt (eds.), Open MIND. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group. http://open-mind.net/papers/dreamless-sleep-the-embodied-mind-and-consciousness-the-relevance-of-a-classical-indian-debate-to-cognitive-science/getAbstract
Windt, J. M., Nielsen, T., & Thompson, E. (2016). Does Consciousness Disappear in Dreamless Sleep? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(12), 871‑882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.09.006